The role of ozone therapy in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has rapidly swept across the world. As new knowledge regarding treatment options for COVID-19 has emerged, the use of ozone therapy in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection as an integrative therapeutic option supplementary to standard treatment regimen has been assessed in the present literature. We reviewed, critically analyzed, and summarized all present published literature on ozone therapy in association with COVID-19 via the PubMed database. Various reports and studies on the use of ozone (major autohemotherapy, rectal ozone insufflation, ozone inhalation) in patients affected by COVID-19 indicate that ozone therapy may reduce morbidity and accelerate recovery, while exhibiting a high safety profile with no relevant adverse effects. Current literature suggests that integrating ozone therapy into the existing standard of care and best available therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 patients offers major advantages in terms of superior clinical outcome parameters and amelioration of laboratory results. Further prospective studies are warranted to guide the next steps in the clinical application of ozone therapy and examine its impact on the course of COVID-19.

Ozone therapy in veterinary medicine: clinical indications and techniques

Ozone therapy application and research have increased recently. The mixture of oxygen-ozone (O2-O3) has been used as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of several diseases with beneficial effects. This brief literature review has the objective of disclosing the mechanisms of action and main clinical indications and possibilities of ozone therapy for different conditions. The local and systemic approaches and techniques described for human treatment can be easily transposed for use in animals, such as rectal insufflation;bag therapy;ozonated oil;intradiscal and paravertebral applications;in acupuncture points;minor autohemotherapy, and major autohemotherapy. The possibilities of clinical indications and dosages were also described, including immunological and infectious diseases. Although it is a minimally invasive and relatively safe approach, more clinical studies are necessary to standardize techniques, doses, and clinical indications. © 2022 Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido.

Effect of autohemotherapy in the treatment of viral infections - a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the literature to determine whether autohemotherapy has any effect either clinically or on the immune system on viral diseases on the last ten years. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Searches from the year 2010, with at least 5 patients were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, SciELO, and Web of Science databases. Hand searches were performed in systematic reviews and literature reviews related to autohemotherapy. Unpublished manuscripts were hand-searched in specialized journals. RESULTS: Eight articles were included. Hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and Coronavirus were evaluated. Autohemotherapy had good results in hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and Coronavirus. CONCLUSION: Autohemotherapy is a safe practice that improves symptoms in the treatment of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and Coronavirus. It is necessary to perform more prospective comparative studies with homogeneous protocols.

Using Ozone Therapy as an Option for Treatment of COVID-19 Patients: A Scoping Review.

Recent investigations are seeking a novel treatment to control the new pandemic of coronavirus 19 (COVID-19). The aim of this systematic review was to study the effect of ozone therapy on COVID-19 patients and the available supporting evidence. Electronic databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and TRIP, clinical trial registries, and preprint sources were searched for published evidence-based articles. In addition, manual searching was conducted for articles published up to April 6, 2020, using MeSH and free text keywords with no language limitation. Articles were screened, categorized, and extracted for relative data. Data were reported in a descriptive manner. Among 234 articles, 9 were selected for review of the inclusion criteria. No published original articles were found regarding the efficacy of ozone therapy on COVID-19. Five review studies were found in which the potential role of systemic ozone therapy was concluded to be effective in controlling COVID-19 because of its antiviral, oxygenation, anti-inflammatory, oxidation balancing, and immunomodulation effects. Three ongoing clinical trials were registered in China. A preliminary report of an ongoing study in Italy on 46 patients (11 intubated and 35 non-intubated) showed that in 39 (84%) of the patients, an improvement was seen. In spite of the promising background data, as well as the expert opinions and a preliminary report indicating the effectiveness of ozone, there is still not enough evidence to confirm this as a viable treatment option for COVID-19.

Ozone as adjuvant support in the treatment of COVID-19: A preliminary report of probiozovid trial.

The evaluation of new therapeutic resources against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a priority in clinical research considering the minimal options currently available. To evaluate the adjuvant use of systemic oxygen-ozone administration in the early control of disease progression in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. PROBIOZOVID is an ongoing, interventional, randomized, prospective, and double-arm trial enrolling patient with COVID-19 pneumonia. From a total of 85 patients screened, 28 were recruited. Patients were randomly divided into ozone-autohemotherapy group (14) and control group (14). The procedure consisted in a daily double-treatment with systemic Oxygen-ozone administration for 7 days. All patients were treated with ad interim best available therapy. The primary outcome was delta in the number of patients requiring orotracheal-intubation despite treatment. Secondary outcome was the difference of mortality between the two groups. Moreover, hematological parameters were compared before and after treatment. No differences in the characteristics between groups were observed at baseline. As a preliminary report we have observed that one patient for each group needed intubation and was transferred to ITU. No deaths were observed at 7-14 days of follow up. Thirty-day mortality was 8.3% for ozone group and 10% for controls. Ozone therapy did not significantly influence inflammation markers, hematology profile, and lymphocyte subpopulations of patients treated. Ozone therapy had an impact on the need for the ventilatory support, although did not reach statistical significance. Finally, no adverse events related to the use of ozone-autohemotherapy were reported. Preliminary results, although not showing statistically significant benefits of ozone on COVID-19, did not report any toxicity.